Vergelijking
KPV vs. TB-500
Twee peptiden naast elkaar — identiteit, bewijsbasis, juridische status en bekende bijwerkingen.
Identiteit
Categorie
Genezing
Genezing
CAS-nr.
67727-97-3
geen gegevens
Molecuulmassa
342.4 g/mol
888 g/mol
Halfwaardetijd
geen gegevens
geen gegevens
Sequentie
KPVAc-LKKTETQWerkingsmechanisme
KPV
KPV is the C-terminal fragment of α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH). In preclinical models the inflammation-modulating activity is attributed predominantly to inhibition of the NF-κB and MAP-kinase signalling pathways, accompanied by reduced release of pro-inflammatory mediators. Cellular uptake via the peptide transporter PepT1 has also been described. The precise molecular mechanisms are not conclusively understood and not confirmed in humans.
TB-500
Synthetic fragment of the endogenous protein Thymosin Beta-4. In preclinical models, an influence on cell migration, actin sequestration and neovascularisation has been described. Robust human pharmacokinetic data are not publicly available.
Bewijsbasis
Hoogste bewijs
Diermodel
Diermodel
Studies
4
3
waarvan bij mensen
0
0
Geregistreerde effecten
5
4
Openstaande tegenstrijdigheden
0
1
Gedocumenteerde bijwerkingen
0
2
Juridische status
Volledige vermeldingen
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between KPV and TB-500?
- KPV is classified as "Genezing", while TB-500 is classified as "Genezing". KPV: KPV is the C-terminal tripeptide (lysine-proline-valine) of the hormone α-MSH, corresponding to its positions 11–13. In cell and rodent models an inflammation-modulating activity has been described, primarily via inhibition of the NF-κB signalling pathway. The evidence is drawn almost exclusively from preclinical work (cell culture and mouse); controlled human studies are essentially absent. KPV is not an approved medicinal product. TB-500: Synthetic fragment of the endogenous protein Thymosin Beta-4, specifically the actin-binding sequence. Preclinical models investigate effects on cell migration, neovascularisation and wound healing — robust human data are absent. This page contrasts both neutrally and source-based — with no usage or dosing recommendation.
- Which peptide is better supported by science, KPV or TB-500?
- The highest available evidence level is "Diermodel" for KPV and "Diermodel" for TB-500. A higher evidence level means more robust data, but says nothing about suitability for an individual. The full body of evidence is on each peptide's own page.
- What is the legal status of KPV and TB-500 in Germany and the United States?
- Duitsland: KPV — Niet goedgekeurd, TB-500 — Niet goedgekeurd. Verenigde Staten: KPV — Alleen onderzoek, TB-500 — Alleen onderzoek. These are factual summaries with source and review date on the individual pages.