Comparison
Argireline vs. Matrixyl
Two peptides side-by-side — identity, evidence base, legal status and known adverse events.
Identity
Category
Cosmetic
Cosmetic
CAS no.
616204-22-9
214047-00-4
Molecular weight
888.99 g/mol
802.06 g/mol
Half-life
no data
no data
Sequence
Ac-Glu-Glu-Met-Gln-Arg-Arg-NH2Palmitoyl-Lys-Thr-Thr-Lys-SerMechanism of action
Argireline
Argireline is a synthetic hexapeptide whose sequence corresponds to the N-terminus of the SNAP-25 protein. In vitro it has been shown to competitively inhibit SNARE complex formation (necessary for vesicle fusion in neurotransmitter release). Topical application is intended — given very limited skin permeation — to attenuate cholinergic signalling at the neuromuscular endplate. The effect is orders of magnitude weaker than intramuscular botulinum toxin; the clinical translatability of the in-vitro observations to the skin microenvironment is contested.
Matrixyl
KTTKS is a fragment of the procollagen I sequence and appears to be part of a feedback mechanism in fibroblasts: elevated concentrations signal intact collagen synthesis and downregulate new synthesis, while low concentrations stimulate it. In cell-culture studies, stimulation of collagen types I/III, elastin, fibronectin and glycosaminoglycans has been documented. The palmitoyl modification is intended to improve skin penetration; effect at the site of action (dermal fibroblasts) depends on permeation.
Evidence base
Highest evidence
Human trial
Human RCT
Studies
3
5
of which in humans
2
2
Effects recorded
3
3
Open conflicts
1
0
Documented adverse events
1
1